Rosedale Bank
Nottingham, MD FDIC 29613 $500M-$2B
Quarter Ended
Q1'26
Data as of March 31, 2026
Quarterly Snapshot
Metric Q1'26 YoY Δ Q1'25
Profitability
Return on Assets (%) 0.11% +0.16 -0.05%
Return on Equity (%) 0.58% +0.86 -0.28%
Net Interest Margin (%) 2.56% +0.34 2.23%
Efficiency Ratio (%) 85.33% -12.03 97.36%
Pre-Provision Profit ($M) $1 +0.91 $0
Cost of Funds (%) 1.76% -0.22 1.97%
Balance Sheet
Total Assets ($M) $1,346 +80.73 $1,266
Gross Loans ($M) $951 +33.98 $917
Loan Growth YoY (%) 86.86% -3.04 89.90%
Total Deposits ($M) $1,085 +74.23 $1,011
Shareholders Equity ($M) $254 +5.84 $248
Tang. Book Value ($M) $235 +3.27 $232
TBV excl. AOCI ($M)** $244 +3.15 $241
Loan / Deposit Ratio (%) 86.86% -3.04 89.90%
Credit Quality
NPA / Total Assets (%) 0.40% -0.07 0.47%
Allowance / Loans (%) 0.88% -0.00% 0.89%
Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) 0.57% -0.08 0.65%
Capital
Tier 1 Capital Ratio (%) 0.00% 0.00 0.00%
** TBV excl. AOCI adds back unrealised losses on AFS securities to show capital excluding mark-to-market interest rate impact.
8-Quarter Trend
Metric Q2'24 Q3'24 Q4'24 Q1'25 Q2'25 Q3'25 Q4'25 Q1'26
▃▂▁▁▃▄▆█ Net Interest Margin (%) 2.33% 2.28% 2.24% 2.23% 2.33% 2.39% 2.45% 2.56%
███▁▄▆█▆ Return on Assets (%) 0.20% 0.18% 0.19% -0.05% 0.05% 0.11% 0.18% 0.11%
▂▃▃█▅▄▂▁ Efficiency Ratio (%) 87.4% 89.0% 89.8% 97.4% 92.6% 89.9% 87.9% 85.3%
▅█▇▄▂▁▁▁ Cost of Funds (%) 2.05% 2.24% 2.15% 1.97% 1.83% 1.74% 1.79% 1.76%
▃▁██▇█▄▅ NPA / Assets (%) 0.35% 0.27% 0.47% 0.47% 0.45% 0.49% 0.38% 0.40%
▄▁█▇▇█▄▅ Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) 0.51% 0.39% 0.66% 0.65% 0.61% 0.69% 0.52% 0.57%
▁▆▃▅▆▅██ Tang. Book Value ($M) $228 $233 $230 $232 $233 $232 $235 $235
▃▁▁▃▅▅██ Gross Loans ($M) $916 $897 $894 $917 $931 $928 $957 $951
▁▁▁▁▂▅▆█ Total Deposits ($M) $1,005 $1,010 $1,010 $1,011 $1,015 $1,048 $1,058 $1,085
Portfolio Composition — Q1'26
Loan Mix%
Real Estate98%
C&I / Commercial2%
Deposit Mix%
Nonint.-Bearing Demand7%
Interest-Bearing (core)84%
Brokered / Other10%
← PreviousPresidential Bank, FSB
Next →Shore United Bank, National Association

Help us improve this data

Is this useful? What would you add, remove, or change?